Do geologists use radiometric dating

It is these highly consistent and reliable samples, rather than the tricky ones, that have to be falsified for "young Earth" theories to have any scientific plausibility, not to mention the need to falsify huge amounts of evidence from other techniques.This document is partly based on a prior posting composed in reply to Ted Holden.The principle of superposition therefore has a clear implication for the age of a vertical succession of strata.There are situations where it potentially fails -- for example, in cave deposits.In order for a layer of material to be deposited, something has to be beneath it to support it.It can't float in mid-air, particularly if the material involved is sand, mud, or molten rock.It is not about the theory behind radiometric dating methods, it is about their , and it therefore assumes the reader has some familiarity with the technique already (refer to "Other Sources" for more information).As an example of how they are used, radiometric dates from geologically simple, fossiliferous Cretaceous rocks in western North America are compared to the geological time scale.

They are applied by geologists in the same sense that a "null hypothesis" is in statistics -- not necessarily correct, just testable.The most common rocks observed in this form are sedimentary rocks (derived from what were formerly sediments), and extrusive igneous rocks (e.g., lavas, volcanic ash, and other formerly molten rocks extruded onto the Earth's surface).The layers of rock are known as "strata", and the study of their succession is known as "stratigraphy".But with uranium-lead radiometric dating, certain rock samples can be dated back billions of years.A link is provided to the Wikipedia article on radiometric dating to get you more information.

I thought it would be useful to present an example where the geology is simple, and unsurprisingly, the method does work well, to show the quality of data that would have to be invalidated before a major revision of the geologic time scale could be accepted by conventional scientists.

Please or register to post comments
If spammers comment on your content, only you can see and manage such comments Delete all
Start studying CSET - Geologic Time 083114. How do geologists use radiometric dating to date sedimentary. Radiometric dating makes use of the known decay rates. 
08-Aug-2018 11:05
Reply
Geologists do not use carbon-based radiometric dating to determine the age of rocks. Carbon dating only works for objects that are younger than abo. 
08-Aug-2018 11:09
Reply
The most widely known form of radiometric dating is carbon-14 is what archaeologists use to determine the age of human-made artifacts. But carbon-14 dating won't work on dinosaur bones. 
08-Aug-2018 11:12
Reply
Start studying Radioactive Dating. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards. Geologists use what law to determine the relative age of what rock? 
08-Aug-2018 11:18
Reply
The use of radiometric dating was first published in 1907 by Bertram Boltwood and is now the principal source of information about the absolute age of rocks and. 
08-Aug-2018 11:22
Reply
How do geologists date rocks? Radiometric dating! Radioactive elements were incorporated into the Earth when the Solar System formed. 
08-Aug-2018 11:26
Reply

Do geologists use radiometric dating introduction

Do geologists use radiometric dating

Recent posts

08-Aug-2018 17:59
08-Aug-2018 22:43
09-Aug-2018 04:09
09-Aug-2018 08:51
09-Aug-2018 15:19